Disclosure: WILGO may earn a commission from purchases made through product links on this site.
WILGO RESEARCH INDEX

Human Evidence Index

A fast way to see which launch compounds have randomized human research, pharmacology, physiology, limited clinical reports, or no direct human therapeutic evidence located in the launch review.

HUMAN EVIDENCE

What has actually reached humans?

Human participation alone does not establish efficacy. This page separates randomized efficacy work, pharmacology, physiology, observational evidence and limited clinical reports.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind human pharmacology

CJC-1295

GH and IGF-1 increased for prolonged periods; this establishes pharmacodynamics, not broad performance/anti-aging benefits.

Human PK/PD + randomized phase 2

Ipamorelin

GH pharmacology demonstrated; postoperative-ileus phase-2 key efficacy endpoint was not statistically significant.

Human endocrine and pediatric growth studies

Sermorelin

Older literature demonstrates GH responses and growth-related outcomes in specific endocrine/pediatric settings.

Small randomized topical human study

GHK-Cu

Objective wrinkle/erythema outcomes did not significantly differ after CO₂ resurfacing; patient satisfaction differed.

Human physiologic / observational evidence

MOTS-c

Exercise changes endogenous MOTS-c in human muscle/circulation; exogenous intervention benefit remains primarily preclinical.

Small comparative human studies

Selank

Published anxiety-related studies exist, but the base is small and regionally concentrated.

Human clinical reports

Semax

Stroke/rehabilitation publications exist, but they are not equivalent to a large modern multicenter evidence base.

Limited human reports; no published randomized efficacy result located

BPC-157

Most of the established literature remains preclinical. A historical Phase I registry record exists without a published result in the index.

No direct human therapeutic evidence located in launch review

KPV

Current index evidence is cellular/animal/review literature.

Important: “Human evidence” is deliberately broad here. Follow the compound page before drawing conclusions about design quality, sample size, endpoints, replication, formulation, or clinical relevance.